The article is written by Katja Dyppel, Jakob Bundgaard & Peter Koerver Schmidt.
Read the article here.
The article is written by Katja Dyppel, Jakob Bundgaard & Peter Koerver Schmidt.
Read the article here.
It has been decided to set up a central digital register for tax losses in Denmark in 2014 or 2015.
As part of the preparation of the establishment of a tax loss register the Danish tax minister has proposed new legislation concerning the registration of existing tax losses carried forward.
One important effect of the proposed legislation is that the tax losses carried forward will be forfeited if they are not timely registered.
1. Which entities?
The following entities will be obliged to make a separate report to the Danish Tax Authorities regarding the tax losses carried forward:
Individuals are not subject to the obligation to register tax losses.
2. What information to report?
The relevant corporations etc. must make a digital registration to the tax loss register of all tax losses carried forward at the time of registration.
Thus, the registration must include losses carried forward from the tax year 2002 and subsequent tax years ending prior to the registration date.
The registered tax losses must be allocated to each relevant tax year. However, a registration of the aggregated amount of tax losses may be registered if the periodization has no effect on the possible utilization of the losses, e.g. for corporations not included in a Danish tax consolidation with other entities.
Further, a separate registration must be made of all tax exempt restructurings (mergers, demergers and transfer of assets) for the period from 2002 and subsequent years, however, only with regard to restructurings resulting in a transfer of a tax loss from one entity to another.
3. Which entities are obliged to file?
All relevant corporations with losses carried forward must file the information to the tax loss register.
However, the information for all entities included in a Danish tax consolidation must be filed by the management company of the tax consolidated group.
4. When to file?
The information cannot be filed now as the tax loss register has not yet been established.
It is expected that the tax loss register will be operational in 2014 or 2015. At this time more detailed rules regarding the registration will be published, probably with a 3 months’ deadline for the digital registration of the required information. The registration period is expected to be carried in late 2014 or early 2015.
5. The effect of untimely registration?
Tax losses not registered within the deadline will be forfeited and cannot be utilized against future taxable income. Please note that this will also be the case even if the Danish Tax Authorities previously has received information regarding the losses in the filed tax returns.
If the aforementioned tax exempt restructurings are not registered within the deadline the transferred tax losses will be forfeited.
6. What to do now?
The proposal is expected to be adopted by the Danish parliament in a few months and the tax loss register is expected to be operational in 2014 or 2015.
Thus, the 3 months’ registration period will probably be in late 2014 or early 2015.
A correct registration at that time can only be made if the relevant entities has collected and produced the following information:
The collection of this information can often be quite time consuming. Thus, we recommend that the relevant entities initiate this process now in order to be able to file the relevant information within the deadline.
Read the article here.
Peter Koerver Schmidt has written an article on whether the Danish CFC rules are in conflict with the freedom of establishment despite the Danish reaction to C-196/04 Cadbury Schweppes.
The author concludes that the Danish CFC rules may still constitute a restriction on the freedom of establishment. Furthermore, he concludes that the reaction to Cadbury Schweppes and the recent ECJ case law has led to uncertainty on whether the Danish CFC rules can be justified.
Read the article here.
Here is what peers and clients said:
Joining the Danish market in January 2012, Corit Advisory is a boutique tax firm spearheaded by Jakob Bundgaard, who brings with him 13 years’ experience of the Danish tax market with Deloitte. They are a team with a high level of technical expertise, boasting four PhDs in tax law among their seven tax professionals, who were described as “extremely skilled advisers” by a client. Bundgaard is also an honorary professor of tax law at Aarhus University and was described as an “outstanding tax technician” by a Danish peer. The practice therefore prioritises technical competencies and specialises in complex, international tax matters.
The article is a follow-up on a previous article by Michael Tell. It deals with whether the Danish Corporate Tax law § 11 B is in compliance with the free establishment rule, art. 49 TEUF, in the light of C-350/11, Argenta.
It is concluded that assets allocated to permanent establishments in other EU/EEA countries may also be included when calculating the asset base after SEL § 11 B.
Read the article here.
The article provides an analysis of company exit tax regimes with a particular focus on the recent ECJ decision in Commission v. Denmark (C-261/11).
The article outlines the acceptable scope of exit tax regimes for companies, analyses unresolved issues, including the length of deferral, guarantees for deferred exit taxes and interest charges levied on deferred exit taxes. Finally, the EU compatibility of the proposed Danish exit tax regime is analysed.
Read the article here.
This Friday Corit Advisory hosted a 2 year birthday reception. We would like to thank all participants for a wonderful afternoon among great people. We missed those of you unable to make it.
The Corit team
A bill on exit taxation has been proposed (L91). The bill introduces the establishment of a deferral scheme.
In this connection CORIT Advisory has asked the Tax Minister to answer several questions. Read our comments and questions here.
Michael Tell has written an article about Danish interest limitation rules. The article analyses the complex Danish interest limitation rules in the Corporate Tax Act (SEL §§ 11, 11B and 11C), hereunder the compatibility with EU law.
Furthermore, the paper discusses alternative methods to evaluate the Danish interest limitation rules.
Read his article here.